

I am sitting across the polished boardroom table from you.
The air conditioning is humming. The coffee is mediocre.
You slide it across the table. The Binder.
It is 200 pages thick. Perfectly formatted. Professionally bound. The title page says “Corporate Business Continuity Plan v7.0.”
You smile nervously. I smile professionally.
I pick it up and feel the weight of it. I flip through a few pages, nodding sagely at the flowcharts and the dense paragraphs of text.
And in that moment, we both participate in the great lie of corporate compliance.
Because here is my confession: I know you haven’t read it.
I know your CEO hasn’t read it.
And most importantly, I know the poor shift supervisor who has to deal with a chemical leak at 3 AM on a Saturday has definitely not read it.
As an auditor, my job is to verify that you have a plan. But as a realist, I know that this 200-page monster isn’t a plan. It’s expensive wallpaper designed to cover your liability.
Here is why your massive BCP is failing the reality test, and some off-the-record advice on how to fix it.
The Psychology of “Compliance Theatre”
Why do companies build these doorstops? It is driven by Octalysis Core Drive 8: Loss & Avoidance.
You are terrified of the Non-Conformance Report (NCR). You are terrified of the regulator. You are afraid that if you leave anything out, you will be blamed if things go wrong.
So, you pay consultants by the pound to generate text. They copy-paste standard clauses, pad it with jargon, and create a document that is “Comprehensive.”
“Comprehensive” is auditor-speak for “Useless in an emergency.”
The Crash Test
When a real crisis hits—when the server room floods, or the supply chain snaps—nobody says, “Quick, someone get the 200-page binder from the CEO’s office and turn to Subsection 4.B(iii)!”
No. They panic. Then they call the guy who has been there the longest and ask him what to do.
Your binder isn’t a recovery tool. It is a legal shield. And while legal shields are nice, they don’t stop water from leaking onto electrical panels.
Off-The-Record Advice: How to Impress an Auditor (For Real)
If you want to pass an audit, give me the binder. I’ll stamp it.
But if you want to survive a disaster, listen up.
1. The “Index Card” Rule
If a critical recovery procedure cannot be summarized on a single, double-sided index card, it is too complicated.
In a crisis, cognitive function drops. Adrenaline makes people stupid.
- The Binder says: “The responsible party shall endeavor to isolate the primary conduit utilizing the designated lockout mechanisms…”
- The Index Card says: “CLOSE VALVE C-101. PUT RED TAG ON IT.”
I would rather audit 20 usable index cards than 200 pages of fluff.
2. CTRL+F is Your Best Friend
Why are you still printing these things?
A physical binder in a locked office is inaccessible when the building is evacuated.
Your BCP needs to be digital, mobile-friendly, and—most importantly—Searchable.
If an operator can’t type “Power Failure” into their phone and get the checklist in 5 seconds, you don’t have a plan. You have a PDF meant for printing.
3. Let the Users Write the “Cheatsheet”
The consultants wrote the 200-page version. Now, give it to the operators and engineers and tell them to write the “Cheatsheet” version.
This utilizes Core Drive 4: Ownership. When they write the simplified steps, they own them. They will remember them.
When I audit you, show me the Cheatsheets that are taped to the control panels, covered in grease and coffee stains. That tells me the plan is alive.
Conclusion: Burn the Binder
Stop trying to impress me with volume. Start impressing me with utility.
A 200-page plan that nobody reads is a liability.
A 10-page plan that everyone knows by heart is a capability.
The next time I come to visit, leave the binder on the shelf. Show me the coffee-stained cheatsheet instead. I promise I won’t write you up for it.
Next Step:
Find the longest procedure in your current BCP. Print it out. Take a red pen and cross out every sentence that doesn’t tell someone exactly what action to take.
See how small you can get it.
The information in this article was partially generated by Google’s Gemini, an AI language model, and has been reviewed/edited for accuracy and relevance.




Leave a Reply